Real images have differing shades of gray, depending on lighting conditions, the slope (slopes towards the sun are brighter than those pointing away from the sun, etc.), and whether the surface is composed of light or dark materials. Typically, images have histograms that resemble the familiar "bell-shaped" curve used to assign classroom grades.
Examination of Figure 1 shows three attributes of the Viking histograms, relative to the MOC histogram.
Brightness # of Pixels % of Image Graph of # of Pixels 50 441 0.03 51 1 0.00 52 458 0.04 53 1 0.00 54 646 0.05 55 3 0.00 56 2051 0.16 57 2 0.00 58 2703 0.21 * 59 1 0.00 60 7432 0.58 *** 61 2 0.00 62 22573 1.78 ********** 63 0 0.00 64 22217 1.75 ********** 65 1 0.00 66 40797 3.21 ******************* 67 1 0.00 68 51385 4.04 ************************Note that the odd-numbered brightness values (e.g., 51, 53, 55, etc.) occur very infrequently in the image (1 or 2 times in the entire image), while even values (50, 52, 54, etc.) occur much more often. This shows that there really is one-half the amount of data (every other brightness level) between 0 and 255, or only 128 real shades of gray.
Compare this to a similar section of the MOC histogram:
Brightness # of Pixels % of Image Graph of # of Pixels 40 0 0.00 41 0 0.00 42 0 0.00 43 2 0.00 44 6 0.00 45 42 0.00 46 94 0.00 47 161 0.00 48 263 0.00 49 387 0.00 50 851 0.01 51 2207 0.02 52 4872 0.05 53 9014 0.09 54 13674 0.14 * 55 18935 0.19 * 56 25813 0.26 ** 57 37456 0.38 *** 58 56386 0.57 **** 59 91238 0.93 ******* 60 142126 1.45 *********** 61 196481 2.00 **************** 62 235086 2.39 ******************* 63 262813 2.67 ********************* 64 294254 2.99 ************************ 65 332896 3.39 ***************************Note that for MOC, that once values begin to appear, around brightness "42," every brightness value thereafter has an associated large number of occurrences.
Thus, the every-other value nature of the Viking data is responsible for the spacing seen in the histogram. This is the difference between 7- and 8-bit data.
The second attribute of the Viking data, that is, the long "tails" of values, can be seen in another excerpt from the 035A70 table:
Brightness # of Pixels % of Image Graph of # of Pixels 140 305 0.02 141 0 0.00 142 318 0.03 143 0 0.00 144 236 0.02 145 0 0.00 146 230 0.02 147 2 0.00 148 234 0.02 149 0 0.00 150 271 0.02 151 0 0.00 152 195 0.02 153 3 0.00 154 170 0.01 155 2 0.00 156 174 0.01 157 2 0.00 158 158 0.01 159 1 0.00 160 209 0.02Note that every even brightness value has a few hundred occurrences. This is similar to the example given earlier of an image with equal numbers of pixels at all brightnesses. Inspection of the raw images (e.g., see the raw images in http://www.msss.com/education/facepage/face.html) shows "salt and pepper" noise (randomly spaced pixels that are either darker or brighter than their neighbors) that is characteristic of the telecommunications system used during Viking. This noise produces the long "tails" seen in the histogram.
Thus, the second attribute is explained by the noisier communication system of Viking relative to Mars Global Surveyor.
The final attribute is explained by a combination of the two previous explanations. The Viking image histograms are more spread out than the MOC image histograms because (1) the Viking data were "expanded" from 7- to 8-bit during their initial ground processing in 1976 and (2) radio system noise accounts for the longer tails.
Figure 2 shows shows three histograms. The top shows the 8-bit histogram of Viking image 035A70, as described above. The middle shows what that histogram looks like when the low values associated with the every-other nature of the data are removed (thus recreating the "original" 7-bit, 128 gray levels recorded by the Viking camera. Note that the spread in brightnesses is now one-half what it was earlier: the actual spread of brightnesses for 035A70 is seen to be between about 30 and 65-70, or 35-40 shades of gray. The bottom histogram is that from the MOC image, showing a range from about 45 to about 95, or roughly 50 shades of gray.
Thus, the MOC data are not particularly different from the Viking data. Indeed, the MOC data actually have more gray levels than the Viking images.